On 2001-08-06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
>The only difference I see is a process "ksoftirqd_CPU0" running on 2.4.7
>and not running on 2.4.6.
>Read the source about ksoftirq, but it seems that has been around for a
>while now (since 2.2), so I don't understand why there's this process on
>2.4.7 and NOT on 2.4.6.

See e.g. http://lwn.net/archives/ (July 26th, 2001) for coverage on
ksoftirq and related naming issues.




_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to