Sorry, Jay - I don't have the evaluation specifics (it was in my last job) - but we tested them using their wireless encryption and authentication, and it went well - the executives in my last job were using them and they also seemed to be reliable. It is not standard, and that may be a problem in the future, but for now, for the needs that they had, it worked well.
Connie -----Original Message----- From: Jay D. Dyson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:38 PM To: Sadler, Connie J Cc: Security-Basics List Subject: RE: Secure PDAs - an oxymoron? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Sadler, Connie J wrote: > The closest thing to a secure PDA that I have found is the Blackberry > device - we did an evaluation, and they actually came out pretty good. Interesting. Is this "Blackberry device" the same as shown at http://www.blackberry.net/ ? If so, was the wireless connectivity disabled in the security evaluation? Also, do you have the procedures and findings from that evaluation online somewhere? (A quick Googlesearch yielded little but marketing stuff.) Please advise. Thanks! - -Jay ( ( _______ )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--. C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----<) | = |-' `--' `--' `---------- Si vis pacem, para bellum. ----------' `------' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys. iQCVAwUBPAuqVrlDRyqRQ2a9AQFUVQQAh4G/SLsltmzJYr2MP6YWxQC0t9luPMTO cWTO1ZMPOHePscqy7nSTmnVp4VsM+Um/tCtT7b+1Dbb8fg/l/++V8SCIg9GgnmXK dniDeclCHywNMPJOFhHofkuS2Ct6pAd5OWEdFhGZJlQt3MeWClUAhoNpkWEmWJdc G4R4+tliElc= =7g7l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
