surelly, I am missing something. In a widely open network as this, how can it be secure ??
Iain McAleer wrote: > Hey guys, > > To be honest, if your system is secure a firewall is redundant. I am aware > of a company here in Perth that is part of a multi-million dollar > corporation. They have NO firewalls in place and are not implimenting NAT. > Infact they have live IP's for all their workstations. The reason they have > no firewall and can keep running with this is because their system is > secure. The biggest security risk is always going to be exploits and your > own clients idiocy. > sauda��es, Irado Furioso com Tudo Linux (SuSE) User 179402 se abrirem as portas de *todas* as pris�es, os roubos ainda ser�o em menor volume do que os de nossos pol�ticos. Na verdade, mal perceber�amos a diferen�a (think about)!.
