IMHO, it's easier and more reliable to edit a .conf or .ini file than
point-and-click my way through a GUI.  I deal almost exclusively with
WinNT/2K and IIS, and have to make and follow checklists and scripts
to make certain I've done everything in the proper order.  The process
is time consuming and tedious, with too much margin for human error.

If I could start off with a .conf or .ini that's already been
properly configured for security, it's much easier to be certain the
machine is secure.  Auditing existing machines would be easier as well,
just compare the current .conf to the template and resolve the
differences.

>From a systems administration point of view, Windows is a horrible
pain in the ass.  I wasn't a big fan of the dozens of .INI files in
Win3x, and I'm forever trying to remember where the .conf files live
on the UNIX/LINUX boxes I sometimes have to deal with, but at least
I could find, read, edit, compare, backup and restore these files
without spending a lifetime trying to decipher SIDs, GIDs and other
meaningless (to me, at least) hexadecimal strings.

Let's not talk about what a huge rectal cramp it is to try and make
these changes over a 33.6kbps dial-up connection using pcAnywhere or
WinVNC!


Reply via email to