Incorrect, sorry Jason. Radmin uses a single TCP port (not UDP), which is configurable, and end-to-end everything is encrypted with 128 bit strength. I have connected through a firewall only allowing the single TCP port. It's also fast, and has a tiny footprint.
Toby -----Original Message----- From: Jason Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote control i will second the use of radmin, BUT it uses UDP only, although port selection is customizable. you can restrict access by IP also, if you are not running a firewall or IPsec. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote control Check out radmin at www.radmin.com. Cheap, stable, small and secure. Toby -----Original Message----- From: Aditya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:02 PM To: Steve Littleford; Calhoun, Heath Cc: Tom Geldner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote control > This guy wants to control his servers from the same location. I'd > tell > him to buy Remotely Possible because file copy over VNC isn't > straightforward. It is also faster over a WAN connection. But, if cost > were an issue he could install VNC and an ssh daemon. Then putty and > iExplore to control the box. You can get a free ssh daemon in the > CygWin project. He could even tunnel your VNC over SSH as many have > already suggested. > > -Steve for win32 only ( actually win98 and win2k to be more specific ) can any one please point the detail to implement the putty + iexplore stuff to be done on the client side and vnc + ssh stuff on the server side any quick info or links or papers ( actually anything ) would be very helpful éb½êÞvë"ž axZÞx÷«²‰Ú”Gb¶*'¡óŠ[kj¬0Âf¢–ÚÚ©Ê&
