Quoting Robert M. Judy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > OK, I missed a bunch of this (flame part) but aren't the MacOS > running WebStar more secure and as flexible as either of the Winows > or *nix based servers?
No such thing as "more secure". Different security approaches - yes. Elimination of basic security hazards in the default install (such as not running a service as root/Administrator) - yes, but all in all the least thing to be assumed about anything is that it is "more" or "less" secure. Security is binary and "100%" are never reached, so the question is, how hard can it be made for an attacker to exploit the given insecurities.
