What the heck are you jabbering on about now?   I simply said that wasn't
really a solution.  Using these tools aren't a bad idea, but it's not
solving the problem, it's just masking a bigger problem.  It's better to use
more secure software (i.e., not an email client that has vulnerable to email
viruses/worms) than to run an anti-virus on your emails.  I.e., not running
an insecure service that forces you to use a firewall to limit who can
access that service.  Not that some of these things aren't valid to run
anyway, but for the purpose of trying to save your ass from a decision of
running bad program or service, it's not the solution.  How about you calm
down a little.  And yes, for the record, a lot of companies and people run
firewalls and IDS and anti-virus due to poor choices on their system, as
well as for useless reasons.

People hear the words "firewall" and to an amateur, it sounds like a neat
security tool that will solve all of their problems.  How many companies
would need a firewall, had they a better set up?  Can't trust your employees
or want to prevent attacks, etc. and block other ports from access in or
out, or want to limit how many times one IP or netblock can access your
system per a specific duration, that's wise.  Want to limit who can access a
certain service to only limited IP's, okay.  Is it a solution that people
should just throw on their system no matter what and a firewall and IDS and
anti-virus are going to change anything simply from running them?  Probably
not, but it depends.

Just telling people to use firewalls, anti-viruses and IDS doesn't mean
anything.  It depends on what they are running and most people that need
these are needing them because of running services or software they probably
don't need or should be using a more secure alternative for.  Is this
difficult to understand?  I never used an anti-virus, simply because I
either keep up to date or don't run software that's vulnerable to it.  This
would do me no good.  If I used insecure software it would, but why use
insecure software?  Now, surely there's a *better solution* to that problem.
How many people need a firewall, really?  Foe what purpose?  If you don't
run a service, you don't have to limit how it can be accessed and by whom.
If you do, why are you running a service that's vulnerable to need to limit
access?  Run secure software and services where a firewall isn't needed,
then use server-side solutions such as tcpwrappers, etc. and then use a
firewall if you still feel the need--it can't hurt.  Is it just something
people should do?  No, they should have a reason.
--
Regards,
Tim Greer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server administration, security, programming, consulting.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Bartley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: Ten least secure programs


Holy cow!! Geesh!!

My advice to others is to always use best practices regardless of the OS
or applications. No one has created the perfect and totally secure
environment, not even Mr. Greer. If that is in error Mr. Greer, please
release it to the masses, we all sorely need your accomplishment (not to
mention huge savings in money for all those useless tools like IDS and
firewalls).

Best Regards,

Dan Bartley

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 20:28
To: Dan Bartley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ten least secure programs

Or don't run programs that are the most insecure out of the one's out
there, and don't run a services that require you to need to use
firewalls, IDS, and anti-virus tools.

Not that these are bad things, they certainly can improve system
security, depending on the platform and what you run, but are not needed
if you choose the right software in the first place.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.

Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.

Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluating SSL VPNs' Consider NEOTERIS, chosen as leader by top analysts!
The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant,
while InStat has confirmed Neoteris as the leader in marketshare.
     
Find out why, and see how you can get plug-n-play secure remote access in
about an hour, with no client, server changes, or ongoing maintenance.
          
Visit us at: http://www.neoteris.com/promos/sf-6-9.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to