On 9/17/2014 1:49 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: >> I would prefer we do it now. If I did not miss something, the new design >> should be more simple >> and straightforward. > > Maybe, but I am not sure since this would surely touch more TLS side codes. > If you want to be totally separated, we also need to move the ciphersuites > definitions outside CipherSuite.java. The TLS side can iterate through all > providers to add them back and create something like a Map<keyExchangeAlg, > KeyExchangeService>. Then we could use this map in all "switch (keyExchange)" > blocks. > > Do you think it's easier to make these changes based on the current codes? Or > based on my modified codes? > > Can you describe the KeyExchangeService interface you are thinking about? > Currently I have to define a two-level interface -- > ExternalCipherSuiteProvider and ExternalCipherSuiteProvider.Exchanger -- to > model the service and the exchange instance. > OK, I will wrap up my ideas of the KeyExchangeService. But it may take a few more days. Wish I could get it ready by next Monday.
Thanks, Xuelei
