On 9/21/2018 4:00 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Are you suggesting having multiple run lines or something like that? I
think we could do that.
I would prefer to to the run lines.
I would like to have it run all cases rather
than short-circuit on the first failure, as each case doesn't depend on
the others.
It should be fine to break earlier as normally the test should be passed.
Let me play around with the run directives and see if we
can make it work more along the lines you want.
Thanks!
Xuelei
--Jamil
On 09/21/2018 03:55 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Once there is a test case failed, it may be not straightforward to
identify which one is failed. Especially, currently, the testing blog
may be swallowed if it is too long. Would you please consider one
case per test? Or break immediately if a test case failed, instead of
waiting for all to complete?
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 9/21/2018 2:35 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hello all,
This adds a test that lets us send different kinds of client hellos
to a JSSE server. It can be extended to handle different kinds of
corner cases for client hello extension sets as well as fuzzing test
cases in the future. It also provides some extra test coverage for
JDK-8210334 and JDK-8209916.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8210918/webrev.01/
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210918
Thanks and have a good weekend,
--Jamil
