On Fri, 21 May 2021 20:37:30 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The code change refactors classes that have a `SuppressWarnings("removal")`
>> annotation that covers more than 50KB of code. The big annotation is often
>> quite faraway from the actual deprecated API usage it is suppressing, and
>> with the annotation covering too big a portion it's easy to call other
>> deprecated methods without being noticed.
>>
>> The code change shows some common solutions to avoid such too wide
>> annotations:
>>
>> 1. Extract calls into a method and add annotation on that method
>> 2. Assign the return value of a deprecated method call to a new local
>> variable and add annotation on the declaration, and then assign that value
>> to the original l-value if not void. The local variable will be called `tmp`
>> if later reassigned or `dummy` if it will be discarded.
>> 3. Put declaration and assignment into a single statement if possible.
>> 4. Rewrite code to achieve #3 above.
>>
>> I'll add a copyright year update commit before integration.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> update FtpClient.java
src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Component.java line 630:
> 628: }
> 629:
> 630: @SuppressWarnings("removal")
I'm confused. I thought the reason this wasn't done in the JEP implementation
PR is because of refactoring
that was needed because of the usage in this static block and you could not
apply the annotation here.
Yet it seems you are doing exactly what was supposed to be impossible with no
refactoring.
Can you explain ?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4138
