On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:33:10 GMT, 温绍锦 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> These weren't in `java.util.DecimalDigits` but have been copied from >> `java.lang.StringLatin1` - part of an unfinished refactoring? There's no >> clear-cut answer where these best fits but it seems reasonable to keep them >> in `StringLatin1` and `StringUTF16` respectively. > >> It's unused now. Do we expect usages to be added in following PRs? > > I plan to provide the getChars method in this PR and use it in my other PR > #15555. I also plan to submit another PR to optimize java.time toString, and > I will also use this method. > https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/commit/cc82e8c11aeb27c0f8581363f7133c85f6022ca1 > These weren't in `java.util.DecimalDigits` but have been copied from > `java.lang.StringLatin1` - part of an unfinished refactoring? There's no > clear-cut answer where these best fits but it seems reasonable to keep them > in `StringLatin1` and `StringUTF16` respectively. StringLatin1.getChars has been moved to DecimalDigits.getCharsLatin1 ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15651#discussion_r1321461917
