On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:34:57 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes, doing this as a separate PR is fine with me. > > @jaikiran Let me clean up the comments that are not anymore accurate in this > particular PR. I personally try to avoid this type of changes that only touch > the whitespace or comments blocks, including the copyright header ones, > because they increase the number of connections between unrelated changes, > that makes the fix less portable. @sercher, it's OK if you leave the test in the current form. Just fixing the `@summary` test on the test definition should be enough. I have spoken to others and the agreement is that since we already have similar tests in this area, it probably is a better thing to let this test stay in this manner instead of devicing some new way to test this. Sorry about the previous guidance to update these test comments. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28577#discussion_r2580623450
