On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:37:45 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The intent is "{1} may need to be recompiled against the up-to-date {0}
>> class-file dependency".
>>
>> Also the original English term is not exactly accurate - It should have been
>> "InnerClasses attribute **entry** for {0} in {1} inconsistent with source
>> code". An unfortunate miss there.
>
> So the Chinese translation is still not precise and it should be something
> like "按照"?
Uhh not quite... I don't know what's the translation term for recompile {1}
with the latest {0} in classpath. So compiling {1} using {0} kind of makes
sense.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28802#discussion_r2620629526
