On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:43:46 GMT, Weijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Good catch. I'm going with this option since it doesn't make sense. to >> update this line anyway when the original file didn't change this line. I'll >> submit the issue about these words not being translated nonetheless. Thanks! > > I guess someone has complained that the 2nd "private" should not be > translated. The problem in this PR is that both "non-private" and "private" > are back to English. I think the 2nd should not be translated but the 1st > should, or, at least it can be written as "非private“. Keeping a "non-" in > Chinese looks strange. Agreed. I have reverted the second private back to the not-translated version. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28802#discussion_r2620910384
