Hi Vladimir,
Sorry again about the delay, and thanks for the reminder. I just looked
through your patch, and it looks like quite a useful feature. I have a few
questions:
- You added this capability in for the "text with autocomplete" input type,
but not for "textarea with autocomplete". Is there a reason for that, or
you just didn't need it for textareas?
- Will this work for inputs that allow multiple values? It seems like it
won't.
- It appears that this validation will only kick in if the field is
declared as "mandatory". Is that true, and if so, is it on purpose?
-Yaron
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Yaron,
>
> Have you looked into my patch about validation. Could you please update
> status?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Sorry about the delay - we've had the Thanksgiving break here, which has
>> restricted my internet time significantly. This patch sounds very
>> interesting, and I plan to look at it at some point soon, unless someone
>> else does first.
>>
>> -Yaron
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Vladimir Kostyukov <
>> vladimir.kostu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All! I've resent my mail about validation patch, because I haven't
>>> got any feedback.
>>>
>>> I've just successfully implemented correct validation feature in
>>> Semantic Forms (see attached).
>>>
>>> Actually, when I've started use SMW I was surprised that it is not
>>> support any validation mechanism (I mean one-to-many case).
>>>
>>> Now, we can use "existing values only" property for "text with
>>> autocomplete input" and with "combobox" elements. But I've changed
>>> behavior of validation mechanism. Now incorrect fields are not
>>> clearing when user input incorrect data. It is checking on submitting
>>> phase.
>>>
>>> Also my patch fixed bug with fields which edited last. For instance:
>>> we can enable "existing values only" for combobox in current
>>> implementation and it will not work for fields, in which we enter
>>> incorrect data and than click submit (without changing focus) (see
>>> "change" event of jQuery).
>>>
>>> In current patch version there is not special message for "non
>>> existing value". I am using "blank field" message.
>>>
>>> I use my patch in our corporate project and it works fine. What do
>>> think about it?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vladimir Kostyukov
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
>>> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
>>> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
>>> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
>>> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Vladimir Kostyukov
>
>
--
WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization
This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of
discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model
of a cloud services business. Read Now!
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
