Jiri Kuthan wrote: > Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > > General requirements: > > > > - ? exception support (under discussion)? > > I think we should also clearly state the scope, i.e., what circumstances > are actually supposed to raise an exception. There are all kinds of > "failures": failed routing logic (no route, user-location lookup hasn't > yielded a contact) , server error (no memory), failed external > interaction (database, DNS), failed network operation (no route found > for forwarding), failed transaction processing (timeout). > > Also in this context, if we do it, it could be meaningful to change > failure_route and such to be exceptions.
My original intention was to only have exceptions for fatal errors that result in sending of a response back to the UAC. I admit, though, that the more general idea of having events has its beauty. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
