Martin Hoffmann wrote: > Jiri Kuthan wrote: >> Martin Hoffmann wrote: >>> Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: >>>> This is a call for proposals for changes and features you would like to >>>> see in the future in ser.cfg scripts. >>> Two more things: URI as a attribute type with the same access options as >>> URI selects (eg., $foo.user) and lists as attribute type. >>> >>> While the former is nice to have, the latter is very important to me. >>> Currently, to call forward to a list of recipients, I put all of them >>> into one attribute, separated by comma and then have to run a route >>> recursively that tears that apart and append_branche()s them. >> do you have to? >> >> IMO a current data model's feature (which some consider a bug) is the >> capability >> to have multiple same-named AVPs. (getting you an unsorted set of values) > > Never tried that. But how would I get that into the Request-URI of > extra branches?
Never tried that :-) (So far typically used with acl=long-distance, acl=internatinoal, etc....) Putting the AVP set in the destination set should be workable somehow, if not it is a missing feature obviously. -jiri > > Regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
