Jiri Kuthan wrote: > Martin Hoffmann wrote: >> Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: >>> This is a call for proposals for changes and features you would like to >>> see in the future in ser.cfg scripts. >> >> Two more things: URI as a attribute type with the same access options as >> URI selects (eg., $foo.user) and lists as attribute type. >> >> While the former is nice to have, the latter is very important to me. >> Currently, to call forward to a list of recipients, I put all of them >> into one attribute, separated by comma and then have to run a route >> recursively that tears that apart and append_branche()s them. > > do you have to? > > IMO a current data model's feature (which some consider a bug) is the > capability > to have multiple same-named AVPs. (getting you an unsorted set of values)
Never tried that. But how would I get that into the Request-URI of extra branches? Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
