Stephen McConnell wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > >>The real problem is that the names used to report missing .jars are > >>hard-coded rather than being the properties containing the names of > >>the actual .jars used. They are bound to get out of sync. unless > >>someone remembers that they need updating. > >> > >> > > > >Please submit a patch to fix this properly. :-) > > > > It's done! > I've updated the check-targets.properties to reference and report the > correct mail jar name and tied the default.properties > reference to use > the check-targets.properties values. > > Steve.
That was quick and saved me the effort. Thanks! -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
