Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It's done!The real problem is that the names used to report missing .jars arePlease submit a patch to fix this properly. :-)
hard-coded rather than being the properties containing the names of
the actual .jars used.
Thanks, Steve. :-) Were there other jars that need the same treatment?
No. This only concerns the jar files that are not included in the James cvs.
Stephen.
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
