On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 18:08 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: <snip> > One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. > Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ default db is > Derby, too).
+1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. It certainly solves the synchronization problem at hand and solves a number of other deeper problems. -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
