On 8/8/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. > > It certainly solves the synchronization problem at hand and > > solves a number of other deeper problems. > > I'm not sure I have enough time but I'll try to set-up a proof-of-concept > creating an ActiveMQ based SpoolManager/SpoolRepository. > I probably need to setup a throughput test using postal so I would be sure > I'm going in the right direction.
Why not just start with our own internal memory-driven JMS impl? Then if we can find a suitable JMS impl that handles clustering with adequate performance, it's largely a configuration change? I'm also pretty sure that ActiveMQ requires JDK 1.4, and I thought some of the clustering capabilities required jgroups or some other more restrictive open source license. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
