> > One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager. > > Now that we added derby it would be also easier (ActiveMQ > default db > > is Derby, too). > > +1 Using ActiveMQ would effectively solve JAMES' clustering problem. > It certainly solves the synchronization problem at hand and > solves a number of other deeper problems.
I'm not sure I have enough time but I'll try to set-up a proof-of-concept creating an ActiveMQ based SpoolManager/SpoolRepository. I probably need to setup a throughput test using postal so I would be sure I'm going in the right direction. I've to commit my SMIME stuff before :-) Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]