On 1/5/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Danny Angus schrieb:
> On 1/5/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> The best way would be a native, logical, hierarchical mailbox access
>> through the Mailet API.
>
> If you would like to expand on this idea I'd be interested in seeing
> what it looks like when applied to sandbox/mailet-refactorings/. If
> you want to have a go yourself please do, otherwise talk about it and
> I'll do something.
>
> d.
>
But whouldn't this bind the mailet api to james ? Maybe i just not
understood . Please explain ;-)
Not necessarily. The mailbox manager interfaces could be moved to the
API, but only if they allow other implementations to easily implement
mailbox manager. however the javadocs do say:
" * An important goal is to be JavaMail feature compatible. That means JavaMail
* could be used in both directions: As a backend for e.g. accessing a Maildir
* JavaMail store or as a frontend to access a JDBC MailboxManager
* through JavaMail. "
*if* this is true I can see no reason why we wouldn't benefit from
abstracting access to hierarchical mail storage.
d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
