robert burrell donkin-2 wrote:
>
> i'd like to gauge opinions about whether anyone else feels strongly
> about supporting non-streaming inputs for MimeTokenStream. i've been
> keeping this in mind whilst reviewing jochen's patches but this has
> lead to conflicts about the design
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-30). the price of
> support will be greater complexity.
>
Robert, I am completely lost, what we are discussing here.
What are "non-streaming inputs"? If you are referring to java.nio: The patch
I am developing (keep in mind: This patch is *not* the issue in MIME4J-30)
was developed specifically with java.nio in mind. However, my patch is not
even proposed. Why do we discuss it *before* I post my proposal?
Jochen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Mime4J--Support-For-Non-Streaming-Inputs-tf4490104.html#a12805801
Sent from the James - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
