Am Freitag, den 21.09.2007, 15:30 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > it's really about objectives and aims rather than technical designs > > > i wonder whether it's worthwhile having what's probably going to be a > > long technical discussion about a design for a unified parser for both > > streams and non-streams. if no one else really feels strongly about > > non-streaming implementations then it's probably best for me to drop > > this goal, revert the changes i've made to allow support for efficient > > non-streaming and let jochen optimize mime4j just for streams. > > I agree with you: let's talk about use cases before detailed design. As > Serge asked, what are the use cases for both? What are the trade-offs in > choosing to support or limit the exposed functionality? > > Please note: I may not be responding until Sunday evening. > > --- Noel >
+1 bye Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
