JAMES Nightly Build System wrote: > >> ActiveMQ has good spring integration. it's a lot of work tapping >> it's power within phoenix. > > OSGi, as JSR-291, is the emerged standard for JSE. Felix is our OSGi > container. We ought to use it. > > See also: > http://www2.osgi.org/JSR291/HomePage > http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/08/osgi-jsr277-debate >
FWIW we've been OSGi-ifying ActiveMQ lately so it'll work inside ServiceMix (which now uses Felix as its core OSGi container : http://cwiki.apache.org/SMX4/runtime.html) - so you should be good to go if you move to OSGi with JAMES and want to use ActiveMQ. OSGi does indeed rock; its a great way to support hot deployment & sorting out the classpath; though my word of caution is you can spend a long time fiddling with the OSGi metadata to get things to work out :). Sometimes just putting all the jars in a lib directory and setting your CLASSPATH to lib/*.jar in Java 7 is way simpler! :) (I still can't believe it took over 10 years for the java command line tool to support wildcards inside CLASSPATH expressions). -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-tp14037280p14269120.html Sent from the James - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
