Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On 8/7/08, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same
level
of the api module, so it would be:
- deployments
- functions
- libraries
- apis | commons | utils
[...]
ATM I would go with the -util suffix.
[...]
Opinions?
as i read this proposal, it's not really adding any more layers, just
allowing more types of module in the lowest layer. basically, we add
one or two more naming conventions for modules that behave like APIs.
i'm reluctant to add more layers and would strongly prefer JAMES to be
coupled just by APIs but this proposal seems a reasonable stepping
stone to me.
Cool! Thank you for "rewording" my proposal. You got it exactly how I
thought it :-)
i should have the ant for this work very soon
Cool! If I didn't already give you a kudos on ohloh I should definitely do
this after you took care of implementing my proposal. I didn't expect so
much :-)
+1 should mean active support ;-)
[...]
First cut is in. (Probably not as elegant as I'd like.) Please let me
if you need any more changes.
Robert
I had to make some fix (utils was not included in libraries classpath,
phoenix-deployments has its own build.xml to be updated too) but it was
really simple.
I already introduced a couple of util modules and Hudson told me he's
happy now with both ant and m2 :-)
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
