Hi Stefano, all the line pushed stuff was allready merged to trunk ;) Even POP3Server an RemoteManager already use the pattern...
Bye, Norman 2009/10/12 Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]>: > If you remember almost 3 years ago we (you and me) started a similar > refactoring that is here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/server/sandbox/inactive/handlerapi-experiment/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/?view=log > > That branch mainly includes a more advanced fastfail design > introducing hooks, and also change the model for the protocol handling > to "line push" method (even if the code is more a Proof of concept > than a production ready wrapper). Once the protocol handler is push > based it should be trivial to "switch" the transport from avalon to > mina. > > (I'm not saying that you should start from that branch, but maybe it > worth having a look at it,too) > > Stefano > > 2009/10/12 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: >> Hi all, >> >> as part of my study I need to write some docs and proof of concept >> about "threading vs. async processing". So I thought it would be a >> good thing to refactor james smtpserver to use mina sockets etc. I >> would do the work in a sandbox/branch. I think this would be one major >> step for james for an avalon-free future and would prolly allow us to >> ship smtpserver as standalone product in the future , for example >> mireka ( cc to [email protected] because he is one of the authors). >> >> Any comments / feedback ? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
