Hi, I know they switched back. But from my understand they switched back because the whole async stuff made it complex from their point of view. Thats why there is now a MailsterSMTP, which is based on the SubEth SMTP with Mina. You can read up some of the details here:
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/projects.php?section=2 Bye, Norman 2009/10/13 Hontvári József <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > it might be interesting to know, that SubEtha SMTP switched to MINA > previously, then later abandoned it. Performance was a secondary > aspect in the decision, and there were little measurement. I am sure, > a detailed study would be popular, whatever the result is. > More info here: See http://infohazard.org/se/archive_msg.jsp?msgId=42764 > > J. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> as part of my study I need to write some docs and proof of concept >> about "threading vs. async processing". So I thought it would be a >> good thing to refactor james smtpserver to use mina sockets etc. I >> would do the work in a sandbox/branch. I think this would be one major >> step for james for an avalon-free future and would prolly allow us to >> ship smtpserver as standalone product in the future , for example >> mireka ( cc to [email protected] because he is one of the authors). >> >> Any comments / feedback ? >> >> Bye, >> Norman >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
