Well, what a shame, I missed that! This is a fantastic news, then :-) This is going to be interesting, then!
Stefano 2009/10/12 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: > Hi Stefano, > > all the line pushed stuff was allready merged to trunk ;) Even > POP3Server an RemoteManager already use the pattern... > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2009/10/12 Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]>: >> If you remember almost 3 years ago we (you and me) started a similar >> refactoring that is here: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/server/sandbox/inactive/handlerapi-experiment/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/?view=log >> >> That branch mainly includes a more advanced fastfail design >> introducing hooks, and also change the model for the protocol handling >> to "line push" method (even if the code is more a Proof of concept >> than a production ready wrapper). Once the protocol handler is push >> based it should be trivial to "switch" the transport from avalon to >> mina. >> >> (I'm not saying that you should start from that branch, but maybe it >> worth having a look at it,too) >> >> Stefano >> >> 2009/10/12 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> as part of my study I need to write some docs and proof of concept >>> about "threading vs. async processing". So I thought it would be a >>> good thing to refactor james smtpserver to use mina sockets etc. I >>> would do the work in a sandbox/branch. I think this would be one major >>> step for james for an avalon-free future and would prolly allow us to >>> ship smtpserver as standalone product in the future , for example >>> mireka ( cc to [email protected] because he is one of the authors). >>> >>> Any comments / feedback ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
