[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12979526#action_12979526
]
Eric Charles commented on JAMES-1181:
-------------------------------------
I like 1 cause "If it can grow, it will grow".
And overall, Tks again for your help.
> Modules dependencies review
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-1181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1181
> Project: JAMES Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 3.0-M2
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: graph-server-check.gif
>
>
> Just opening an issue because it's simpler to share the image. This can even
> be closed as won't fix or resolved.
> I found some time to checkout and take some review the current trunk,
> starting from modules dependencies.
> I have to say the code seems better organized than some months ago, but the
> layers increased. This is not necessarily bad, but I think it worth noticing
> this.
> On past we simply had 3 layers (api, library, function) with clear dependency
> scheme: libraries depending only on api, api having no dependencies,
> functions depending on api or libraries.
> Now I tried to create an updated scheme and things are a bit more complicated
> now.
> E.g:
> util depends on dnsservice-api
> core depends on util
> mailetcontainer-library depends on core
> So in this case between library and api we have 2 more layers.
> I didn't investigate on the real classes creating this dependencies issues,
> so I don't know how feasible is to fix this "layering" and if it worth or not.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
