On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Eric Charles <eric.char...@u-mangate.com>wrote:
> After all, if we develop mailbox-imap, we could have Hupa using the > mailbox-api to a local james or any remote server. > Yep, this is the point, I think with that is not necessary to maintain imap code in hupa server side, although we need to have a james server doing that work, also we can use james storage to cache copies of the messages. > > Prolly the user and domain stuff could go in a separate hupa module > (separation of concerns). > agree > > That would be cool, > > Eric > > > On 04/19/2012 10:38 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > >> Hi Manolo, >> >> Thx a lot for the detailed information. >> >> - On the decoupling: I like gwt-dispatch, but was thinking to still >> further decouple stuff in separate module independent of any http/gwt/... >> >> - Direct access to james mailbox will be killer, but efficient imap >> client service is still needed for non-james users (I have in my >> bookmarks >> https://github.com/dhanji/**sitebricks/tree/master/**sitebricks-mail<https://github.com/dhanji/sitebricks/tree/master/sitebricks-mail>which >> support oauth2...) >> >> - mailbox-imap would be a cool module :) >> >> - About the client side, I work since 5 months on a GWT project and I >> made stuff I couldn't have done with any other web technology, so you >> won't have to convince a prayer ;). We now use also separate module for >> client, shared and server, but important, we put our business logic in >> other modules agnostic from any presentation. >> >> Thx again, >> >> Eric >> >> On 04/19/2012 09:48 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> Actually hupa has everything decoupled, this is the reason why we use MVP >>> and Command patterns. >>> Let me explain how hupa is designed, and why the imap latency your >>> realize. >>> >>> - Server side >>> Everything in server-side is agnostic about the client-side (browser), we >>> use handlers for each service and they are very well unit tested. We >>> offer >>> those services via ajax, rigth now with a gwt-dispatch servlet, >>> although we >>> could easily add other servlets to allow rpc via ajax (json) for non-gwt >>> client applications. >>> The main problem now in the server side is that we are not doing imap >>> caching nor we access directly to the mailbox. >>> So each time a user interacts with the ui, hupa have to ask the >>> imap-server >>> and download headers or messages just in case (this is very expensive in >>> far-off imap servers like gmail, large inboxes or messages with >>> attachments). >>> >>> I have in mind to use directly the james mailbox instead of imap, this >>> should increase considerably the performance like gmail does with >>> mailboxes. >>> Even we could have a mailbox implementation in James which could be an >>> imap/pop client (something like fetchmail) and it should be feasible that >>> a user in James could configure other mail sources (like gmail does) >>> >>> There are many things to do in the server side though, think that we just >>> have coded a simple imap client so as we could develop faster the visual >>> part. >>> >>> - Client side >>> It is gwt, so everything is converted into javascript resulting a pure >>> desktop-like app made with javascript which requests services via ajax to >>> the server. Note that we don't have any jsp parser not html generator. >>> >>> The goal of using gwt is that instead of coding in javascript (jquery + >>> plugins + widgets etc) we code in Java, so as we can take advantage of >>> the >>> full java ecosystem: first we have a featured IDE (refactoring, coverage, >>> javadoc...), second a way to decouple code modules using libs and maven >>> dependencies, and finally we can use real patterns and object oriented >>> programing because of java. >>> >>> The main pattern we use in client side is MVP (model-view-presenter) with >>> allows completely decouple the views from the client-application >>> logic, so >>> as we can mock the view and test every single method (including the ajax >>> dialog with the server). >>> With this pattern, testing does not need to start a servlet container >>> so as >>> we can run integration tests very fast. >>> >>> Instead of using ajax json or xml, and because the server side is >>> java, we >>> use a special ajax serialization which comes with gwt, so as we can >>> use the >>> same objects in both server and client sides (here we use the command >>> pattern). >>> >>> We have a set of very simple views styled with css, but we could enrich >>> them very easily either using css3 or replacing with more rich widgets >>> like >>> gxt, smartgwt, etc. >>> >>> Of course, like you say, we could replace gwt by any other approach to >>> build a web application, in this case the only reusable part is the imap >>> client in the server part. But this is a very small part of the all the >>> Hupa code. >>> What we pretended with hupa is to develop a very rich desktop-like app to >>> run in the browser, the only way to do that is using profusely javascript >>> (apart from java applets, flash, etc). There are many technologies to do >>> that: >>> 1.- codding javascript by hand (you have js libraries like jquery with >>> makes the work easier. >>> 2.- using java and converting it to js using gwt-compiler (there is >>> also a >>> scala to js compiler) >>> 3.- using frameworks like jsf-2, rails, grails, lift, etc which injects >>> javascript portions into html templates. >>> >>> Based in my experience, >>> #1 You have full control over the generated js, but you need good >>> skills in >>> js (most people who uses js tend to copy pieces from here and there) and >>> deep knowledge of obfuscation and compression js tools to produce good >>> performance apps. >>> #2 There is a learning curve to understand well that your java code >>> wont be >>> run in a jvm but in a browser, but the IDE helps a lot and gwt-compiler >>> will take care of generating good quality js (optimized, reduced, etc). >>> #3 It's very good for traditional apps based on a page per view with some >>> kind of ajax to update, edit, etc. But when you want a >>> single-page-application, sooner than later you have to deal with >>> javascript. >>> >>> >>> I hope this clarifies a bit the architecture or Hupa. >>> >>> - Manolo >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Eric Charles<e...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hupa should also focus to decouple the 'services' from the 'ui'. >>>> >>>> If we have independent services for efficient IMAP mailbox read/write, >>>> contact management, authentication/authorization..****. (name any), we >>>> can: >>>> >>>> 1.- Focus on those libraries without the ui concern - for example, my >>>> current experience with hupa is that the mailboxes reading sometimes >>>> fails >>>> due to (I think) latency,... >>>> >>>> 2.- Put any ui on top, GWT being the first developed, but any other one >>>> could be further added. >>>> >>>> Thx, >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/18/2012 05:20 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: >>>> >>>> I've been taking a look to the demo, it looks pretty nice because of a >>>>> good >>>>> selection of css, I'll deep into the code when I had a while. >>>>> >>>>> You can see Hupa in action in either servers: >>>>> http://hupa.alcala.org (it's a shared server I use, it could be down >>>>> sometimes) >>>>> http://james.zones.apache.org (it's a recent instance deployed in the >>>>> James jail server). >>>>> >>>>> In order to use hupa you have to login with any gmail user >>>>> (previously you >>>>> have to enable imap in that user). >>>>> >>>>> - Manolo >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Ioan Eugen >>>>> Stan<stan.ieu...@gmail.com>** >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dhurbo, Manolo, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the developer doing the work should choose whatever platform >>>>>> he is most comfortable with. Good code has to come out of his hands >>>>>> and comfort aids that. Having both with be great (but most likely hard >>>>>> to maintain in the long run). >>>>>> >>>>>> As a user I would like to see something usable that looks nice. I >>>>>> wouldn't care if it where implemented in a specific platform. >>>>>> >>>>>> MyFaces mailbox demo looks very nice. I haven't checked Hupa demo (I >>>>>> know Manolo has one installed, but I don't have a gmail test account >>>>>> and I didn't see any SSL), maybe we should have a mocked HUPA install >>>>>> like MyFaces one available online. I wonder what it will take to do >>>>>> that? >>>>>> >>>>>> My cents ;). >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/4/18 Dhrubo<dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com>****: >>>>>> >>>>>> Manolo - >>>>>>> Primefaces Mailbox template --- >>>>>>> http://www.primefaces.org/****showcase-labs/ui/****layoutMailbox.jsf<http://www.primefaces.org/**showcase-labs/ui/**layoutMailbox.jsf> >>>>>>> <http://www.**primefaces.org/showcase-labs/**ui/layoutMailbox.jsf<http://www.primefaces.org/showcase-labs/ui/layoutMailbox.jsf> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Its basic but good starting point. They have very rich component >>>>>>> suite >>>>>>> >>>>>>> also >>>>>> >>>>>> you can look into Primefaces extensions for more layouts and Rich >>>>>>> editor >>>>>>> support besides what is provided by Primefaces itself. >>>>>>> The extensions project is hosted here - >>>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/****primefaces-extensions/<http://code.google.com/p/**primefaces-extensions/> >>>>>>> <http://**code.google.com/p/primefaces-**extensions/<http://code.google.com/p/primefaces-extensions/> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They also have their entire showcase online. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slight deviation - following the principles of Zimbra we can easily >>>>>>> (hopefully) we can turn this webmail app into a desktop app like MS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OUTLOOK >>>>>> >>>>>> or Thunderbird by embeding Jetty with Mozilla Prism (is it a dead >>>>>>> >>>>>>> project i >>>>>> >>>>>> guess) or some kind of XULRunner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also I am available for any consultancy or help on Primefaces, JSF 2, >>>>>>> Spring. I can also do lot of development as well provided I have a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> commit >>>>>> >>>>>> privilege on SVN :) . One big advantage I see using JSF 2 is >>>>>>> modular app >>>>>>> development. Please check this link - >>>>>>> https://community.jboss.org/****wiki/ModularWebAppsWithJSF2?_*** >>>>>>> *sscc=t<https://community.jboss.org/**wiki/ModularWebAppsWithJSF2?_**sscc=t> >>>>>>> <https://community.**jboss.org/wiki/**ModularWebAppsWithJSF2?_sscc=t<https://community.jboss.org/wiki/ModularWebAppsWithJSF2?_sscc=t> >>>>>>> **> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This can be further extended with Spring and Ant style configuration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino >>>>>>> <man...@apache.org>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dhrubo, Is there a site running the the webmail example of >>>>>>> primefaces?, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> is there a way to download the .war file?, I'd like to take a look. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> - Manolo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dhrubo<dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do not intend to launch a debate on GWT v JSF 2. But JSF 2 is the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> JEE >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> standard for UI and Primefaces comes with sample layout for webmail >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> may help you get started very fast. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dhrubo<dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> These days with JSF 2 frameworks like Primefaces et all we do not >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> need any js , ajax is out of the box and we need little html know >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> how >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also they come with more than standard layouts and theme support. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> James being an Apache product and Apache also develops JSF 2 >>>>>>>>>> imp, we >>>>>>>>>> should use JSF 2 with easiest and huge set of components like in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Primefaces >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> which is excellent documented highly active community. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So my two cents >>>>>>>>>> +1 Primefaces >>>>>>>>>> -1 GWT >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please note I have no affiliation or neither work for Prime >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Teknoloji >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino< >>>>>>>>>> man...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -1 JSF2 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 GWT >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Like JSF2, GWT is a proved technology, open sourced, and apache-2 >>>>>>>>>>> licensed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> GWT adds a set of benefices to James, mainly we continue being >>>>>>>>>>> java >>>>>>>>>>> centric >>>>>>>>>>> and we dont need serious javascript, ajax nor html skills to >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> understand >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> project, secondly we can deliver a product which is unit >>>>>>>>>>> tested and >>>>>>>>>>> javadoc-ed in all its components. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to expose the benefices of developing large rich >>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> gwt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> vs hand-written js because there is a lot of literature along the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> web. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> - Manolo >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Dhrubo<dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think we should move to JSF 2 than GWT which is mostly >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> controlled >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> by >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> company. >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache with its vision and endeavor for OSS we should use - JSF >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 - >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Tomahawk (or Mojarra) + Primefaces >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan< >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> stan.ieu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pe 11.04.2012 18:48, echo a scris: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Manolo >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very glad to see your reply. The reason why I want to choose >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> gwt-platform >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> was that it is more smoothly to update from current Hupa's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state(gwt-presenter). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I like the native one rather than gwtp since it will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> import >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> resources. What I really want to do is to replace the MVP by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gwt >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> just afraid whether I can complete the proposal before the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deadline >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> GSoC, so >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked for you advices. If possible, I want to use the core >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvp >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> in >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> gwt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> realize it. Over these days, I have been researching the Hupa >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> GWT >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> technology and later on I want to show you something I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changing. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To the new features, I would like to implement as many >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> features, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> that a >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> email client should have, as possible not only during the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GSoC >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> period, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> but also >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> after that. And I am also keeping my eyes open on the Hupa's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wonderful ideas come out gradually. Sure I will give my deeper >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discription after >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my researching. I don't think it will be late. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wish you a happy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Echo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been reading your application and it looks right to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One thing I see is that you have selected gwt-platform >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> of >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> core mvp in gwt but you don't say any reason about why you >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> first option. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also I'd like a deeper description of how you pretend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> face >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> new >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> features, I mean components, persistence, customization etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Manolo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Echo, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sound good. I'm not familiar with GWT and I would like to know >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> more. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> luck with your research and send us the findings. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ioan Eugen Stan >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://ieugen.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------******--------------------------* >>>>>>>>> *--** >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --**--------- >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.****** >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> server-dev-unsubscribe@james.****apache.org<server-dev-** >>>>>>>>> unsubscr...@james.apache.org<server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org> >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> **org< >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> server-dev-help@james.apache.****org<server-dev-help@james.** >>>>>>>>>> apache.org <server-dev-h...@james.apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards... Dhrubo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/****dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/**dhrubo> >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.**com/in/dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Kind Regards... Dhrubo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/****dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/**dhrubo> >>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.**com/in/dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Kind Regards... Dhrubo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/****dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/**dhrubo> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.**com/in/dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo> >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Kind Regards... Dhrubo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/****dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/**dhrubo> >>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.**com/in/dhrubo<http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ioan Eugen Stan >>>>>> http://ieugen.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--** >>>>>> --------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> server-dev-unsubscribe@james.****apache.org<server-dev-** >>>>>> unsubscr...@james.apache.org<server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> server-dev-help@james.apache.****org<server-dev-help@james.** >>>>>> apache.org <server-dev-h...@james.apache.org>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------** >>>> --**--------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>> server-dev-unsubscribe@james.****apache.org<server-dev-** >>>> unsubscr...@james.apache.org <server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org>> >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> server-dev-help@james.apache.****org<server-dev-help@james.**apache.org<server-dev-h...@james.apache.org> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- > eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > server-dev-unsubscribe@james.**apache.org<server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > server-dev-help@james.apache.**org<server-dev-h...@james.apache.org> > >