I still use James v2 in production. I could be convinced to move forward
(migration of config is a concern), but I still do run it, and would be able to
fix any bugs, given the amount of code in there that was written by me.
Are there any particular defects that need to be addressed? I agree that it
should be viewed as maintenance only, with no new development.
Oh, and hi! 😊
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: btell...@apache.org <btell...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 5:18
To: server-dev@james.apache.org
Subject: End of support for Apache James 2.3.2 ?
Hello,
Following recent discussions on gitter, issues are reported on Apache James
version 2.3.2.
This version is not under active development (released in 2013 with a security
fix in 2015 version 2.3.2.1).
No active development had been undertook recently.
The source code is not available on Git / Github.
I fear no real active committer is able to fix issues on it.
It uses Avalon Phoenix retired in 2004 (yes...).
For archeologists, sources can be found at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/2_3_2_1/
As such I propose to:
- Make it clear with a formal vote we can refer to that the Apache James PMC
no longer supports Apache James vers 2.x.
- Archive related downloads
- Remove references from the website
- Write a little email to the Apache announce mailing list, general@james,
server-user@james.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Benoit TELLIER
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
