I spent a lot of effort trying to migrate manually from 2.3.2 to 3.4.0 in a
project recently. It was a nightmare made necessary because the
organization did not allow any of the convenience mechanisms you guys built
into the new James 3 streams for migration. Additionally, the project used
a custom user interface that was dependant on the data structure of the
2.3.2 database message repository.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:36 PM btell...@apache.org <btell...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hello Noel,
>
> First many thanks for your engagement that I believe did allow to have
> the amazing piece of software we have today.
>
> Apparently James 2.3 fails to talk SMTP with a modern Zimbra server,
> expects a 'dot' terminated stream. This 'bug' do not occur on modern
> James versions.
>
> Do we also maintain Apache Excalibur [1] ? Retired in 2010... As far as
> I get it, James 2.x actively relies on it.
>
> [1] https://excalibur.apache.org/
>
> That, is one of many dependencies, to be fairly honest I would not be
> surprised a careful dependency audit finds hundreds of CVEs. Not to
> mention the use of outdated java versions. Given the effort, do we, as a
> community want to engage with serious maintenance of Apache James 2.3.x
> ? I have not seen security updates for years
>
> Also, new upcoming users are not fully aware of the state of that
> application, and might mistakenly believe they would get Apache grade
> quality (security, backed by an active community, etc...)
>
> In my opinion we should at the very least stops advertising that
> version, that means:
>
>  - Archive related downloads
>  - Remove references from the website
>
> That is our responsibility.
>
> Stating clearly as a community that we no  longer assume maintining it
> would be better to me.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Benoit
>
> On 23/07/2021 23:10, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I still use James v2 in production.  I could be convinced to move
> forward (migration of config is a concern), but I still do run it, and
> would be able to fix any bugs, given the amount of code in there that was
> written by me.
> >
> > Are there any particular defects that need to be addressed?  I agree
> that it should be viewed as maintenance only, with no new development.
> >
> > Oh, and hi!  😊
> >
> >       --- Noel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: btell...@apache.org <btell...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 5:18
> > To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> > Subject: End of support for Apache James 2.3.2 ?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following recent discussions on gitter, issues are reported on Apache
> James version 2.3.2.
> >
> > This version is not under active development (released in 2013 with a
> security fix in 2015 version 2.3.2.1).
> >
> > No active development had been undertook recently.
> >
> > The source code is not available on Git / Github.
> >
> > I fear no real active committer is able to fix issues on it.
> >
> > It uses Avalon Phoenix retired in 2004 (yes...).
> >
> > For archeologists, sources can be found at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/2_3_2_1/
> >
> > As such I propose to:
> >
> >  - Make it clear with a formal vote we can refer to that the Apache
> James PMC no longer supports Apache James vers 2.x.
> >  - Archive related downloads
> >  - Remove references from the website
> >  - Write a little email to the Apache announce mailing list,
> general@james, server-user@james.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Benoit TELLIER
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to