My experiment shows that for example Postfix is smart enough to detect
that there is a missing CR-LF between header and body and will add the
CR-LF. James however does not not detect this and will treat the body as
(invalid) headers.

Martijn Brinkers 

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:53 +0200, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> Well it's kind of strange that there is no separating line between the
> headers and the body because that would mean that all lines are
> considered to be headers. Now it could be that the CR-LF is there but
> the logger doesn't show it but I do think the CR-LF is missing. Now it
> could be that some mailers are 'smart' and add the CR-LF seperator when
> they see a line that is not a valid header but James does not afaik. So,
> I think you should first me 100% certain that the CR-LF between the
> headers and body is added.
> 
> Martijn 
> 
> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:43 -0400, Vance, Trevor K. wrote:
> > Martijn,
> > 
> > This is interesting that you have success.  What more can I share
> > regards to my config?  I don't think the missing empty line is really
> > the issue.
> > 
> > Trevor
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martijn Brinkers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:29 PM
> > To: James Users List
> > Cc: Vance, Trevor K.
> > Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments
> > 
> > Sending a uuencoded message seems to work with my setup.
> > 
> > What I still don't get is why there is not an empty line (ie only CR-LF)
> > between subject and body? see your log
> > 
> > Martijn
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 16:53 -0400, Vance, Trevor K. wrote:
> > > >From: Martijn Brinkers
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 1:44 PM
> > > >To: James Users List
> > > >Cc: Vance, Trevor K.
> > > >Subject: RE: A problem with uuencoded attachments
> > > >
> > > >Could you sent a complete example message?
> > > >
> > > >The example DATA portion (below) you show seems not to separate the
> > > headers and body. Is that
> > > >intentional?
> > > >
> > > >Martijn Brinkers
> > > 
> > > I was only showing a portion of the conversation.  Here's the entire 
> > > output.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Trevor
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Checking option -attach
> > > Checking option -uuencode
> > > Blat v2.6.2 w/GSS encryption (build : Feb 25 2007 12:06:19)
> > > 
> > > Checking option -to
> > > Checking option -subject
> > > Checking option -attach
> > > Checking option -uuencode
> > > superDebug: init_winsock(), WSAStartup() returned 0 (?)
> > > superDebug: Hostname <localhost> resolved to ip address 127.0.0.1
> > > superDebug: Official hostname is [munged]
> > > superDebug: Attempting to connect to ip address 127.0.0.1
> > > superDebug: Received 102 bytes:
> > > 220 [munged] SMTP Server (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1) ready Wed, 27 Aug
> > > 2008 15:44:18 -0400 (EDT)
> > > <<<getline<<< 220 [munged] SMTP Server (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1) ready
> > 
> > > Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:44:18 -0400 (EDT)
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 39 bytes:
> > > EHLO [munged]
> > > >>>putline>>> EHLO [munged]
> > > superDebug: Received 124 bytes:
> > > 250-[munged] Hello [munged] (127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]) 250-PIPELINING 250
> > 
> > > ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES <<<getline<<< 250-[munged] Hello [munged] 
> > > (127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]) <<<getline<<< 250-PIPELINING <<<getline<<< 250
> > 
> > > ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES Sending test.txt to tvance[munged]
> > > Subject: test1
> > > Login name is tvance[munged]
> > > Attached binary file: test.txt
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 38 bytes:
> > > MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>putline>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > superDebug: Received 48 bytes:
> > > 250 2.1.0 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
> > > <<<getline<<< 250 2.1.0 Sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 36 bytes:
> > > RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>putline>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > superDebug: Received 51 bytes:
> > > 250 2.1.5 Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK <<<getline<<< 250 2.1.5 
> > > Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 6 bytes:
> > > DATA
> > > >>>putline>>> DATA
> > > superDebug: Received 44 bytes:
> > > 354 Ok Send data ending with <CRLF>.<CRLF> <<<getline<<< 354 Ok Send 
> > > data ending with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 323 bytes:
> > > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:44:18 -0400
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > X-Mailer: Blat v2.6.2 w/GSS encryption, a Win32 SMTP/NNTP mailer 
> > > http://www.blat.net
> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: test1
> > > test
> > > begin 644 test.txt
> > > &=&5S=`T*
> > > `
> > > end
> > > .
> > > superDebug: Received 28 bytes:
> > > 250 2.6.0 Message received
> > > <<<getline<<< 250 2.6.0 Message received
> > > superDebug: Attempting to send 6 bytes:
> > > QUIT
> > > >>>putline>>> QUIT
> > > superDebug: Received 63 bytes:
> > > 221 2.0.0 [munged] Service closing transmission channel <<<getline<<< 
> > > 221 2.0.0 [munged] Service closing transmission channel
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to