> I could not differentiate anything in there from generic SOA + BPM. The distinction is significant.
> The concept of the assembly is a concept that is leaning toward > something that would lead to greater componentization of service > groups if done right, but it's nowhere now. Why do you say nowhere? There is product support for it today. > I had a talk with John Evdemon yesterday (co-Chair of BPEL TC) and >V2.0 of BPEL isn't due until May and not all participants are > buying into IBM's proprietary extensions for human workflow and >executable linking. Additionally, BPEL won't support sub-processes, > so if Tuscany is based on BPEL as the glue, this things a long way > from reality. SCA has absolutely no reliance on BPEL. It is one of many potential Domain Specfic Languages that can be bound to SCA. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
