Todd - thanks very much. The text of the article seems ok, although perhaps a bit disjointed.
I think the major point is on target though - about developers doing more and more component assembly and less development of code from scratch. We see a lot of analogies to try to explain what's happening in the software industry as it continues to mature, and the bricklayer analogy isn't bad since it implies the use of standard size bricks to improve productivity and lower cost (compared to the trouble of constructing those old stone walls we see a lot of in New England for example). Eric --- Todd Biske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had to split it into two PDFs, since there were > some ads in the > middle. > > http://www.biske.com/eWeek021306.pdf > http://www.biske.com/eWeek021306.p2.pdf > > -tb > > On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:57 PM, JP Morgenthal wrote: > > > eWeek has not posted this article online. Does > anyone have the > > ability to > > scan and send to the rest of the group? I may be > able to, but not > > until > > next week. > > > > JP > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > [email protected] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf > > Of Eric > > Newcomer > > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:42 PM > > To: > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] > eWeek Comparison of > > SOA and > > Web 2.0 > > > > I haven't seen the article either, although I > believe this is the > > one I was > > interviewed for. If so, I hope my contribution > seemed ok ;-) > > > > Based on the comments I've seen here it sure seems > like someone has > > mixed up > > architecture and technology. > > I also am with Anne about this what the heck is > Web 2.0 stuff - I > > don't > > like the name but I suppose we are stuck with > it... > > > > What I hope came through though is the need to > connect the Web 2.0 > > technologies to enterprise data sources using Web > services. > > > > I have blogged a bit about this, but mostly within > the overall > > context of > > the need to standardize the software industry. > The Web 2.0 stuff > > is a great > > illustration of the benefits of standardization, > and to me it's a good > > illustration of the kind of thing the industry > needs to achive in > > enterprise > > software. > > > > The importance of standardization to productivity: > > > > > http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000255.html > > > > Solution through standardization: > > > > > http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000258.html > > > > How it all ties into Web 2.0: > > > > > http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000259.html > > > > Eric > > > > > > > > --- Todd Biske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> There's been a rash of articles on the Web 2.0 > and SOA due to John > >> deVaDoss' (Microsoft) recent comments. While I > just went to the > >> eWeek site and couldn't find the article, I know > I saw that table > >> that > >> you mentioned and I shook my head as well. If I > recall correctly, > >> the > >> article kept flip-flopping on whether SOA and Web > 2.0 were > >> complementary or not, and that table didn't help > at all. > >> > >> It's a shame that the waters were muddied by that > article, because I > >> actually think some of the discussion going on > around SOA and Web 2.0 > >> is very good. I've been making some notes in > prep for a blog entry, > >> but have had some other things to take care of, > so it's still on the > >> back burner. I've got strong roots on the user > side of the world, so > >> tying SOA concepts back to areas where users have > to interact with > >> systems is always interesting for me. > >> > >> -tb > >> > >> On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:56 PM, JP Morgenthal wrote: > >> > >>> Did anyone catch eWeek's horrible article on SOA > >> and Web 2.0 in the > >>> 2/13 issue? Am I crazy or is this the stupidest > >> thing this > >>> publication ever printed? Their chart comparing > >> SOA to Web 2.0 is > >>> downright asinine. They actually listed the > >> communication > >>> mechanism for SOA as SOAP and Web 2.0 as REST. > >> Ummmm, when did > >>> SOAP become SOA-centric? Or better yet, when > did > >> SOA become SOAP- > >>> centric. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> JP > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> JP Morgenthal > >>> Managing Partner > >>> > >>> <image001.jpg> > >>> > >>> <image002.gif> > >>> > >>> Work: 703-648-1520 > >>> > >>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> IM: jmorgenthal (Skype) > >>> <image003.gif> > >>> Professional Profile > >>> My Blog > >>> > >>> Avorcor, Inc. > >>> 12110 Sunset Hills Road > >>> Suite 450 > >>> Reston, VA 20190 USA > >>> > >>> > >>> See who we know in common > >>> > >>> Want a signature like this? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> SPONSORED LINKS > >>> Computer software Computer aided design software > >> Computer job > >>> Soa Service-oriented architecture > >>> > >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > >>> > >>> Visit your group > >> "service-orientated-architecture" on the web. > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email > to: > >>> > >> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > >> Yahoo! Terms of Service. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
