Something else to know would be the rate of adoption
of J/JS.  I have to say I do get the occasional
question about it from customers but outside of this
list I do not hear much about it.

Which products/vendors are offering J/JS support
today?

Thanks,

Eric

--- Gervas Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You can get some information on it at my J/JS Group
>
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jini_javaspaces/files/),
> but I believe
> jini.org is the best source.  What do you think on
> this one, Gregg?
> 
> J/JS is what I call one of Sun's Orphan Java
> Technologies.  I have
> heard many stories (usually involving political
> infighting) why they
> never bothered to promote their Orphans, but I still
> find it
> incomprehensible.
> 
> Gervas
> 
> --- In
> [email protected],
> "Anne Thomas
> Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Jini/JavaSpaces is quite different from CORBA.
> It's not at all a
> > language-specific reinvention of the same old
> thing. It's worth your
> time to
> > investigate it.
> > 
> > Anne
> > 
> > On 3/3/06, William Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Gregg. I'll have a deeper look at that
> site. At first glance
> > > this looks like a good environment for a
> technology like Jini. I have
> > > a friend that will be very interested in this
> article. What's
> > > interesting is the real time (ish) performance.
> My friend has been in
> > > this industry (high performance car data
> collection. monitoring and
> > > test and configuration etc) for years and can't
> imagine moving from
> > > embedded C to Java. I'll have to have him look
> at this - he'll be
> > > interested. I'd also be interested in
> performance metrics and
> > > performance satisfaction metrics for this
> example.
> > >
> > > > I continue to be saddened by the loud voices
> of ignorance that push
> > > > away
> > > > technologies such as Jini which have so much
> to offer for those
> > > > motivated enough
> > > > to look.  The problems of SOA and related
> distributed computing are
> > > > not simple.
> > > >   The Jini platform was put together by people
> who understand the
> > > > science.
> > >
> > > BTW many of us non-Jini-user folks understand
> good science too. I'm
> > > not pushing it away - I just think that it has
> it's place and limits
> > > like all technologies.
> > >
> > > > Your interest in native only integration is a
> little
> > > > alarming.  To me, it says that your systems
> are living on the
> edge of
> > > > performance, or software development
> platforms/skills are limiting
> > > > your choices.
> > >
> > > Money, licensing, existing incumbant technology,
> existing high
> > > performance, mission critical  and
> leave-well-enough alone
> > > applications are often limiting my customers
> choices. My customers
> > > can't just throw out everything they have and
> rewrite their
> > > application in the next new fad of the month.
> They've already
> > > invested millions in these applications and are
> doing $billions of
> > > business with them. Nor can they insert a
> wrapper layer that will
> > > impact their high performance mission critical
> systems - so they want
> > > native integration to a standards-based outside
> world. In other words
> > > they don't want service enabling technology to
> have a negative impact
> > > on their service. (Hence why my customers also
> tend to look more for
> > > smart end-point integration than having to use
> hub technology - this
> > > may seem contradictory but it is not).
> > >
> > > Thanks for the link. I promise to make myself
> less ignorant of Jini.
> > > I have to say this: from my first look at Jini -
> it looks a lot like
> > > a reinvention of CORBA but without the language
> independence
> > > obviously. In fact it looks entirely like a Java
> specific reinvention
> > > of CORBA. (Which already has a Java language
> binding. Why reinvent
> > > this???)
> > >
> > > In fact when I go back to the F1 example I
> wonder why someone
> > > wouldn't use an embedded C CORBA ORB to solve
> the problem? Like other
> > > part so the automotive industry are now doing.
> ??
> > >
> > > William
> > >
> > > On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Gregg Wonderly
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > William Henry wrote:
> > > >> Okay has anyone else had enough of this? Is
> this the Jini list
> or the
> > > >> SOA list?
> > > >
> > > > William, I'm sorry to strike a sour note with
> my reponses.  I've
> > > > sat back and
> > > > watched this list for some time and have seen,
> as Gervas pointed
> > > > out, many
> > > > different themes passing through.  I am
> particularly concerned
> > > > about the
> > > > re-creation of technologies by the ignorant. 
> So, I am sitting here
> > > > trying to
> > > > communicate which "features of desire" for the
> week, are already in
> > > > place in the
> > > > Jini platform.  I've probably (some of the
> responses to yours say
> > > > clearly) done
> > > > a horrible job of providing a convincing
> argument.
> > > >
> > > > I continue to be saddened by the loud voices
> of ignorance that push
> > > > away
> > > > technologies such as Jini which have so much
> to offer for those
> > > > motivated enough
> > > > to look.  The problems of SOA and related
> distributed computing are
> > > > not simple.
> > > >   The Jini platform was put together by people
> who understand the
> > > > science.  The
> > > > fact that the platform doesn't come with a web
> services endpoint,
> > > > and that there
> > > > is not one visible in the Jini community,
> should speak to where the
> > > > real needs
> > > > are.  There are, of course other technologies
> that are starting to
> > > > reveal an
> > > > understanding of the science, and the needs of
> the users.
> > > >
> > > > Jini has no lack of ability to provide
> performant solutions that
> > > > interface to a
> > > > wide range of entities.  Your interest in
> native only integration
> > > > is a little
> > > > alarming.  To me, it says that your systems
> are living on the
> edge of
> > > > performance, or software development
> platforms/skills are limiting
> > > > your choices.
> > > >
> > > > Look at
> > > >
>
<http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/2005/coolstuff/
> > > > TS-1915.html>
> > > > for an example of a performant system created
> to interface with low
> > > > level
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to