Gervas Douglas wrote:
> Yes, Gregg, but like it or not, there are some people who do not want
> to use Java. I believe some of them work in a town called Redmond. I
> guess that it is as much a political issue as a technical one.
Right, but how would one make another Linda implementation that swallowed XML
directly, any less controversial :-) At some point it would be written in some
language with some features associated with the transport of data into and out
of it. Those features would either be enabling or confining for a specific set
of use cases involving other languages/platforms. So what would be the
advantage?
I know I am arguing technically about a political point. I'm just trying to
push hard enough to get more than an emotional response from those that want to
argue about the political points of Java and Jini.
If we could all just get to the technical issues... My feet are not feeling
any
colder though, so we probably still have a ways to go...
Gregg Wonderly
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
