Of course, it's better than calling it SOA 2006, since odds are the press would call it that and then mope when we all don't reach it until 2009.   :)

This is just silly.

-tb

On May 18, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Ron Schmelzer wrote:

Buzzword bingo! I win ;)

Gartner's view of SOA "1.0" is so ridiculous that it's no wonder they believe that a new term needs to be coined to define exactly what we meant by SOA in the first place. SOA as "client-server"? Does anyone really believe in that vision of SOA?

Ignore them. Please. They believe that SOA was "invented" within the past few years. We all know better.

People: use your own minds.

Ron

Michael Champion wrote:
 
"The term, SOA 2.0, also is being championed by Gartner's Yefim Natis, a vice president and distinguished analyst at the firm. Contacted by telephone, Natis stressed event-driven architecture as the main distinction between SOA 2.0 and the first, client-server driven iteration of SOA. "
 
I'm shocked, SHOCKED to see Gartner promoting new buzzwords just as the world starts to get a handle on the previous generation of their buzzwords. 
 


__________ NOD32 1.1546 (20060518) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


__________ NOD32 1.1546 (20060518) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

-- 
_____________________________________________________________
Ronald Schmelzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Analyst
ZapThink LLC
Direct: 781-577-2779 / Main: 781-207-0203


SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS







SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to