>> Since people have given a clear distinction between "transport" and
>> "transfer",

> :)

You laugh but I still don't know why you think these aren't well
defined.

>>  maybe we would also benefit from a clear distinction between
>> "hypermedia application semantics" and "SOAP application
>> semantics".
>
> Hypermedia is a thing that has been studied since the 60s .. if you
> want to understand some of the thinking behind hypermedia (and
> hypertext) I suggest reading some work from the 80s .. it was a hot
> European research topic those days. I'm sure Google can help:
> http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=hypermedia

Hmm. "Hypermedia". Is that part of the internets our prezdint has bin
talkn''bout? I heard him say about that on the talkn' picsure box.

> SOAP does not define any semantics on its own...

Then why try to use a distinct label called "SOAP application
semantics" and suggest it is different from HTTP's semantics?

Everything seems to have a good definition here except for SOAP and
SOA, which are supposedly the keys to the kingdom.

-Patrick







SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to