> world." As Mark points out he prefers one way. Others prefer
> another. You can argue endlessly (as people have, do, and will)
> about whether one preference is "right" or "better" somehow than
> another, or you can just be practical, like Amazon (apparently at
> least) and provide both.
Arguing on this list is one thing. I would not want to argue endlessly
in my organization, but neither would I want to provide both. I don't
see that as practical at all if one approach would work.
Clearly those that provide both demostrate that either could work with
some amount of effort, so then the point is to choose one. But only
one works with the majority of languages, tools, and existing adopted
standards and knowledge. It ain't WS-* so there seems to be no
practical reason to go down that path.
-Patrick
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
