> JMS isn't much use if you're building applications in C#, VB, COBOL, > Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc. > > Language dependency is an anathma to SOA.
I agree with the intent of this position, but "anathema" is going I agree with the intent of this position, but "*too* far. I wrote "something like JMS" because what we are seeing now from vendors and that new AMQP thing, as well as pub/sub and Atom support in XMPP, etc. is a move toward JMS-like behavior in a more universal and open way. Meanwhile, since there is a lot of Java in the enterprise, JMS (potentially along with custom gateway mechanisms) can be a legitimate component of a significant number of actual SOA implementations. -Patrick ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
