Ah...

But REST is resource-oriented rather than service-oriented.
I don't think the two are incompatible, though.
Resource orientation imposes more constraints that service orientation.
In certain applications, those additional constraints can be extremely valuable.

Anne

On 6/29/06, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 6/29/06, Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I list two fundamental principles:
> - service-orientation
> - loose coupling

Sweet! By these measures alone, REST is a better SOA than WS. It's
probably a toss-up wrt service-orientation, but REST is clearly more
loosely coupled than WS because it separates the concerns of interface
and implementation far better... as we've discussed before;

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/message/3427

Mark.


__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to