Eric Newcomer wrote:
> Well you are right, I do completely disagree. I think business people
> are much more interested in processing a transaction than identifying
> all the "things" involved in it. I also think OO analysis and design is
> one of the things holding up progress in SOA. All these folks trying to
> use UML, MDA, what have you based on OO notation are the ones forcing
> the round peg into the square hole IMO.
It's vital for people to understand the difference between tooling and pour
execution with tooling vs the capabilities of a architectural model, when it is
actually use effectively. It is the constant attempts at layering on
simplicity
that choke and inhibit technologies from actually solving problems.
Gregg Wonderly
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/