Jan Algermissen wrote:
> Keith,
>
> On Oct 6, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Keith Harrison-Broninski wrote:
>
>> I'm not against SOA techniques. What I am suggesting is that there
>> is an entire layer missing - an OO modelling layer.
>
> is your position to expose the OO model (being the result from the OO
> modeling layer) to the service clients?
>
> I mean, if you didn't, why should anyone care? How one goes about
> designing a service is her own business, right? Surely every sensible
> designer would have an OO model behind the service anyhow - instead
> of going pack to functional design methodologies just because
> 'services implement business *functions*'. (A service is really not
> much more than the OO remote facade pattern anyhow)
>
That would be the ideal I guess but it's possible to get impedance
mismatch between interface and implementation such that OO doesn't fit
very well because the interface is "not very OO".
> Jan
>
Dan.
>
>
>
>> Unless this is put in place, SOA will end up like BPR - an approach
>> on which the next generation pours scorn, wondering how its
>> practitioners can have been so incredibly short-sighted.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
