On 06/12/06, Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > > The point remains that call it and see for system to system is not > > commercially viable. > > I'd say, that entirely depends on how much knowledge about link > semantics has been hardcoded into the clients. > > The Atom publishing protocol for example solves a heap of machine to > machine interaction problems wih only a handful of link semantics. > (Remember: Enterprise software need not be enterprisey)
Where is atom used in a pure server to server (i.e. not as a content publishing mechanism)? > > Nobody said you should use a media type with just one link semantic > (<a href..>) for machine to machine interaction! What other standard semantics are there? I'm still not understanding how consumers have the meaning communicated to them in advance. > > Jan > >
