On 12/15/06, Steve Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > or c) start an underground movement > of people using it in the belief that "everyone will come to realise". > > The later is often the worst of the two as it tends to explode in a > mess, where as the first can often be ignored by good software > architects and designers.
Hmm, so how are people supposed to distinguish between that situation, and an honest-to-goodness improvement on the status quo? Or do you believe that if it was an improvement, that everybody would immediately recognize it as such and adopt it, despite the fact that it is likely to be disruptive to vendors with entrenched positions in the market? Mark.
