There's a bridge from HTTP to JMS: http://hjb.berlios.de/
I haven't tried it out yet, though. Stefan -- Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/ On Feb 25, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Eric Newcomer wrote: > > Jan, > > In that case I would expect WebSphere MQ to be compatible with the > Web since it has a uniform interface. Correct? > > Eric > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 2:53:27 PM > Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] SOA Pizza Order > Surprises > > > Eric, > > your posting 'deserves' a more detailed reply, so sorry for only > sending a short comment (I still have a pile of work on my desk for > tonight). > > On 25.02.2007, at 18:23, Eric Newcomer wrote: > >> It is just hard to believe that the lack of uniform interfaces in >> SOAP and WSDL is the cause of all the disconnect with the Web. > > The lack of a uniform interface (the plural doesn't really make > sense here, does it?) is contrary to the architectural style of the > Web. That is just an undebatable > fact. An architecture that does not employ a uniform interface can > never be of the REST style and an architecture that does not > specifically constrain itself to > HTTP's set of methods on all objects is necessarily disconnected > from the Web. > > Jan > > > (And, yes, GET /foo/lauchMissile is not HTTP's GET, it is tunneling > the launchMissile invocation through GET) > > > > > > Bored stiff? Loosen up... > Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. > >
